A press conference (video here) led by election integrity advocate Jefferson Davis highlighted the key attributes of the voter fraud scheme perpetrated in Wisconsin.
Update: YouTube deleted the video for violating its terms of service and the link to the press conference was also deleted from the internet.
Davis' presentation was mostly based on the election report authored for former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman. In addition, other election integrity advocates, including Dr. Frank, lawyer Dan Eastman, systems security specialist Colonel Sean Smith, and Constitutional law attorney, John Eastman provided information in support of election integrity and decertification.
The press conference was held immediately after the group met with Wisconsin Speaker of the House, Robin Vos, who now believes there was widespread election fraud in the November 2020 election, but mistakenly believes that the state legislature cannot de-certify the election. Vos' stance against decertification is his mistaken belief that Wisconsin decertification is synonymous with Biden's removal from office....and it's not.
At the outset of the press conference, Davis noted that there is not a movement to decertify the election and restore Donald Trump as President. Rather, the Constitution allows the state legislature to decertify the election whenever the election is not held in accordance with state law -- as was the case in Wisconsin. From Bush v. Gore (my emphasis added):
...that the State legislature’s power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by State legislatures in several States for many years after the Framing of our Constitution. Id., at 28–33. History has now favored the voter, and in each of the several States the citizens themselves vote for Presidential electors. When the state legislature vests the right to vote for President in its people, the right to vote as the legislature has prescribed is fundamental; and one source of its fundamental nature lies in the equal weight accorded to each vote and the equal dignity owed to each voter. The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors. See id., at 35 (“[T]here is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated”) (quoting S. Rep. No. 395, 43d Cong., 1st Sess.).
Given that Wisconsin's ten electoral votes being decertified would not be enough to cause action to remove Joe Biden, he would remain as President. Trump would not be reinstated.
Fraud Scheme Summary: The Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) COVID-19 Response Grants (aka, Zuckerberg money) provided 8.8 million dollars to the Big 5 counties of Dane, Racine, Kenosha, and Brown counties under the auspices of helping people vote during the pandemic. Evidence in the presentation revealed that the CTCLs, in coordination with the Election Registration Information Center (ERIC) and Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) officials, were utilizing bloated voter registration rolls to generate votes for Joe Biden. The software used by the CTCLs was integrated with the software from the United States Postal Service (USPS) in order to track every ballot that was sent by mail.
Yes, you read that correctly...the CTCLs knew how many absentee ballots were in transit through the post office, how many were counted, and how many ballots would be needed to win -- as you will see below.
In addition, the WEC unlawfully directed election clerks to ignore rules regarding the protection of nursing home residents, resulting in thousands of illegal votes being cast. Lastly, the scheme likely involved manipulation of votes via remote (wireless) access to the election servers.
Justice Gableman's team canvassed nursing home voters in the Big 5 counties and found that 3,031 out of 3,261 residents were not aware they voted in the 2020 election. The report noted that many facilities had 100% voter turnout and recommended a full audit of the nursing home (approximately 92,000 voters).
The WEC wants people to believe that 3.2 million of 3.5 million registered voters (or 92%) cast a ballot in the November 2020 election. However, the reality of the situation was that the CTCLs used the voter registration data to deliver votes from phantom voters. For example, the CTCLs would send emails and text messages to "eligible" voters and if there was no response, that "voter" was identified for ballot harvesting. Their fake absentee ballots were then deposited (by "mules") in voter drop boxes.
Attorney Dan Eastman noted that the WEC registration data contained 7.6 million voters, including inactive voters. A team of analysts determined that 182,000 of the voters records were manipulated or changed (by ERIC) each election cycle as a means of readily identifying this pool of "phantom" voters. Interestingly, these 182,000 voters are not in numeric sequence, but separated by nine vacant slots in the rolls. The evidence from the registration data showed over 20,000 people with the same phone number. Eastman stated that multiple state-wide elections (e.g., governor, attorney general, etc) in Wisconsin have been decided by a margin of approximately 20,000 votes.
In short, the vote riggers know exactly how many votes to deliver -- and the CTCL-WEC emails referenced in the Gableman report prove it. The email below occurred shortly after the 3AM vote dump from the city of Milwaukee.
 |
| Email between WEC's Vogg and CTCL's Ryan Chew immediately after 3AM vote dump. |
While not mentioned at the press conference, the 3AM vote dump from the city of Milwaukee contained ZERO write-in and minor party votes out of 168,000 absentee ballots.
Another statistical election anomaly showed that only 4,270 out of nearly 2 million absentee votes were adjudicated. Normally, the adjudication rate for votes in between 2.5-3 percent, however the adjudication rate for absentee votes was only .2 percent.
I've written extensively on the subject of missing write-in absentee votes and Wisconsin was among the states that showed ZERO write-in absentee votes and decline of 27,429 from 2016. I suspect this decline in write-in votes in Wisconsin (and other battleground states) was due to manipulation of the election system to automatically count a portion of Write-In and Minor Party (WIMP) votes for Biden.
Colonel Sean Smith highlighted the 7 of the 10 largest counties in Wisconsin use ES&S systems while the other 3 use Dominion. Both ES&S and Dominion use Dell election servers that all have an Intergrated Dell Remote Access Component (IDRAC) that allows remote access to the system. Smith noted that ES&S notified 89 customers, including several entire US states, that its system had a wireless cellular network chip and that the systems were not tested nor certified. These systems were used in the 2020 election.
Smith stated that none of our election systems are secure because they are assembled in China and there is no supply chain security. Colonel Smith contrasted the election systems against US military weapons systems that are required to have 100% of the components fabricated in the US under a secure supply chain approach. Smith completely debunked the absurd statement from DHS/CISA (Chris Krebs), ERIC, Democracy Now, various self-serving government groups, and the election systems companies that the 2020 election was the "most secure in American history,"
Constitutional attorney John Eastman, citing Bush v Gore, stated that the Wisconsin legislature (and all state legislatures) have plenary power under Article II of the US Constitution to determine the manner of elections. As such, the legislatures to NOT require the courts nor the governor to approve their actions with regard to certifying (or decertifying) an election. Eastman emphasized that the legislatures can abide by the popular vote IF the "right to vote as the legislature has prescribed" was followed. However, the Gableman report identified several statues that were violated in the 2020 election, thus paving the way for decertification.
Note that similar legal violations occurred in Pennsylvania and other swing states.
With an eye to the future, Davis, et al, discussed the need for wards (or precincts) to abandon voting using electronic voting systems. There are 675 municipalities in Wisconsin of under 7,500 registered voters that can discontinue use of voting machines immediately. These 675 communities comprise nearly 1.3 million votes.
These communities would go back to paper ballots that would be scanned (counted) in small batches -- all while being video recorded. The precincts would then report their results to the county. This low level report ensures that votes cannot be added once the precinct reports to the county. This would obviate the need for post-election audits and court battles over recounts.
On March 24th, cell phone data and video of Wisconsin ballot harvesting operations (provided by Truethevote.org) will be presented at a hearing of the Wisconsin General Assembly's Committee on Campaigns and Elections.
Meanwhile, the mainstream media still is clinging to election lawsuits (that weren't decided on the merits), out of context statements from election audit reports, and the absurd statements from Chris Krebs and former US Attorney General, Bill Barr, that the 2020 election was secure and there was no fraud -- and continuing to frame anyone who disagrees as a "conspiracy theorist."
As has been the case for the last five or six years, when the media calls something a conspiracy theory, then you can take it to the bank that the so-called "conspiracy theory" will be proven 100% true.
Ray Blehar, March 17, 2022, 3:17 PM EDT, Updated at 4:29 PM EDT
No comments:
Post a Comment