|Krebs: Deservedly fired for unsupported remarks about security of 2020 election|
Fired former head of the DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Chris Krebs, claimed in a statement:
"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."
You can read the November 12, 2020 statement here.
What is missing from the statement is any evidence whatsoever to back up Krebs' claim or any real attempt to explain the data that shows votes that over 200,000 votes were switched from Trump to Biden in Pennsylvania.
While the statement dismisses the voter fraud claims as "misinformation about the process of our elections," there has yet to be a state government official or local government official to address the discrepancies in the DATA.
The vote fraud/vote switch claim was publicized as FALSE by the lazy, low brow fact checkers at the Associated Press.
The fact checkers, who alleged the claim of vote switching came from anonymous comments on a "pro-Trump" blog, relied on a statement from Edison, who said the claim was false because it hadn't released a report.
No one at DHS or in the media visited the "pro-Trump" blog to investigate.
On November 11, 2020, an individual that goes by the handle of Truman Black posted these voting data from Pennsylvania that originated from the Edison election data system and was fed to the New York Times.
42% of PA Votes Reported; 11:08 PM, EST, November 3, 2020
A picture of the "offending" data was linked to the blog and it is shared below. In this instance .006% of the vote total is switched from Trump to Biden.
The data records actually appear as follows :
The NYT data (in question) was copied to a spreadsheet and I added labels for easier interpretation.
At 4:07 Greenwich Mean Time on 11.4.2020 (or 11:54 PM on 11.3.202o EST) only 54 total votes were added to the count and at that instant Biden gained 17,930 votes while Trump lost 17,877 votes.
Trump lost .006% -- and doing the math you can see that .006 x 2,984,522 = 17,907....about the number of votes shifted to Biden.
Numbers are not exact likely due to rounding.
17,000 votes and counting.....
Here is a clip from CNN shows a vote swap of 19,958 votes from Trump to Biden with 42% of the vote reported:
The clock at the bottom of the photos shows the swap occurred between 10:22 and 10:23 PM on Election night.
37,385 and counting...
41% of PA Votes Reported; 11:04 PM, EST, November 3, 2020
49,184 new votes come across the wire and Biden is awarded 38,208 votes while Trump is awarded 19,038 -- for an impossible total of 57,246 votes added to the total.
57,246-49,184 = 8,062 (Overvotes)
Those 8,062 were formerly in the "lost vote" column and now are FOUND VOTES that find their way to Joe Biden.
This is vote laundering, where votes were previously shifted from Trump to Other/NoVote and then later moved to Biden.
76% of PA Votes Reported, 10:00 AM, EST, November 4, 2020
The next example happened during the mail-in vote counting period and resembles to a great extent what happened to votes in Antrim, Michigan.
In this instance, 4,275 New votes come in. Biden is awarded 1,877. The remaining 2,398 New Votes go into the Other/No Vote bin. Meanwhile, Trump's total is reduced by 3,098.
Running total shows 40,000 more votes for Trump than reported.
The numbers don't lie...and you can find example after example of this is you examine the Pennsylvania data.
Biden's purported margin in PA of 81,348 votes won't hold up under scrutiny.
The Antrim, Michigan Non-Glitch
State officials in Michigan blamed the vote switch their on a data entry problem or human error (or maybe Bigfoot). They went on to state that vote totals weren't changed.
The Michigan file of votes that were provided to the NYT is current through 11:45 AM today.
The data shows Trump losing (-5,420) votes and Biden gaining 3,097 votes....out of 560 "New votes" cast.
To make that happen, the software directed votes to be taken from Trump and split between Biden and Other/No Vote.
The math doesn't lie -- and as promised, the Antrim example is very similar to the Pennsylvania example right above.
This is high tech vote fraud.
Ray Blehar, 11.18.2020 at 4:20 PM EST, Updated 11.19.2020 at 2:56 PM. Updated at 6:47 PM