Top 10 Smoking Guns of 2020 Election System Compromises

 

Fact:  Votes were often deleted in the 2020 Presidential Election

About 40% of Americans (including 70% of registered Democrats) still believe the lie told by DHS/CISA's Christoper Krebs  that the 2020 U.S. election was the "most secure in American history."  The  majority believe the election was not on the up and up.   Over half of non-affiliated voters and 75% of Republican voters are among those in the latter group.

Kreb's November 12th statement also included this patently false statement:

"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

There is ample evidence to the contrary.

Here are my top ten 10 examples that 2020 election systems did not produce accurate results.  

To date, no one from the state governments or anyone else have provided  legitimate explanations to refute this proof of systemic error(s) in the election systems.   In some instances, state officials and/or their representatives confirmed the errors.

1.  Nearly 4 million votes subtracted from Biden and Trump over the course of the 2020 election.

2.   a.  No (zero) write-in votes in any race in the city of Detroit, Michigan.

      b.  No (zero) absentee write-in votes (out of 2.84 million) in Michigan

3.a.  Vote shifting in Antrim County, Michigan  

   b. Non-adjudication of write-in votes in Antrim County.

4.   9,000 more votes than possible on election night in Maricopa County, AZ.

5.   Double counting of ballots in Fulton County, Georgia.

6.   No write-in or minor party votes in the City of Milwaukee's 168,000 vote dump.

7.    Folded ballots cause miscounts in Windham, NH Congressional races.

8.    Approximately 70,000 missing votes for Green Party Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania.

9.    64,492 absentee votes removed from Trump in Pennsylvania.

10.   No (zero) absentee write-in votes in the battlegrounds Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin.

In the majority of cases, these problems were caused by system issues.  The only exceptions were the 4 million votes subtracted (#1) of which some was allegedly caused by human error and the duplicate ballot scanning in Georgia by unscrupulous election workers (#5).

Lyin' Josh Shapiro's PA "Audit" Lies

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro is petrified of what will be exposed when Senator Doug Mastriano conducts a forensic audit of the 2020 General Election.  Not only will it expose that Biden lost bigly, but that he (Shapiro) did too.

Out of fear, Lyin' Josh went on Twitter and spun up four falsehoods in a single tweet about the Pennsylvania 2020 election and Mastriano's audit.

First, let's address his "two audits" falsehood. 

There were not two "audits" in Pennsylvania if you understand the definition of an audit. 

Most audit definitions come from the world of finance and accounting.  The common thread among audit definitions is that audits "confirm the authenticity" of the records.  In this case, it's ballots and/or votes.

Nothing of the sort happened in Pennsylvania after the November 2020 election that confirmed the authenticity of the ballots.

What happened in Pennsylvania was nothing more than recounts based on a sample of ballots.  Whether those were legal ballots or illegal ballots remains in question.

That's why Democrats all over the US (and their media mouthpieces) are decrying post-election audits in the battleground states. 

Here are the details behind Lyin' Josh's "audits."

The first so-called "audit"was nothing more than a recount of a random sample of ballots.  However, that recount was FATALLY FLAWED because at least four counties had incomplete records of the number of voters (a total of 205,000 more votes were cast than voters).

Wanda Murren, a spokesperson for the Pennsylvania Secretary of State readily admitted the records were incomplete.

It is improper to draw a sample without first resolving the discrepancy between the number of voters and votes cast.  Was this issue duplicate ballots being counted?  Or was it a record keeping issue as alleged by Murren?  Or was it a combination of the two?

No one knows for sure. Only a forensic audit can resolve the questions.

Obviously, Pennsylvania should not have certified its election until the discrepancy was resolved.   To otherwise do so was illegal.

Why PA Needs a Forensic Audit

 

PA's 2020 Election Results Don't Make Sense  (Analysis & graphics by Seth Keshel)

A picture is worth a thousand words and the "pictures" in this post get to the heart of why Pennsylvania's 2020 presidential election results should be forensically audited.   The results defy nearly every statistic that predicts election outcomes  -- especially voter registration trends.

The reasons why WIMP votes get stolen

The 2020 steal of Write-In and Minor Party (WIMP) votes reminds me of kids who steal money from a change jar.  Typically, the kids screw up by taking all the quarters and leaving behind just nickels, dimes, and pennies.  The parent or change jar owner is oblivious of the theft until they pick up the jar and notice that it is too light.  After which,  they dump the jar and see all the quarters are missing -- and the theft is confirmed.

In the 2020 election, the (unspecified) vote thieves made the same mistake.  

All that was left in the in the WIMP vote jar was nickels, dimes, and pennies (i.e., an incredibly low number of votes).

So, why are WIMP votes targeted for theft?

Mail-In Ballot Math Doesn't Add Up for Biden

According to Pennsylvania's certified election results, Joe Biden received 1,995,691 mail-in votes in the 2020 election.  Those votes erased President Trump's Election Day lead and eventually won him the Keystone State by 80,555 votes.   

While the votes were counted that way, it is unlikely they were cast that way.  

2016 Vote Rigging Ran Out of Time

A good friend of mine does not believe the 2020 election was rigged because of the "enthusiasm for Biden" that was behind the scenes that drove voter turnout. 

Okay, I'll agree that quite a bit happened behind the scenes....and behind the barricades and poster boards and whatever else Democrats could find to help block vote counting from view.  Those acts helped give Biden the edge. 

But then he also made the argument that if I thought 2020 was rigged in the election system, then why don't I believe that 2016 was rigged for Trump to win.

At first reaction, I stated that if 2016 was rigged for Trump, then Clinton and the Democrats would have raised holy hell about it.  

PA & AZ Cover-Up Write In Vote Totals

In November 2020, protesters and politicians - including PA AG Josh Shapiro -- demanded that every vote be counted.

Do they know that Governor Tom Wolf and Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar didn't follow through?

I've not heard Shapiro question the results that show Pennsylvania didn't count a single write-in ballot.

You can go to these official Pennsylvania state sources here and here and not find a single write-in vote counted for the presidential race.   You can check Ballotpedia too -- nothing there for 2020, but plenty of write-ins for 2016. 

Unlike most other states, Pennsylvania didn't post anything official regarding the number of votes for write-in candidates in 2020.  Arizona posted a write-in count for 2020, however it doesn't match with the county totals.  

Based on analysis of PA's election returns, it is almost certain that a large number votes for write-in candidates -- between 30,000 and 75,000 --  were reassigned as Biden votes.  Based on the evidence, the number is closer to the latter than the former.

This was made possible, in part, by the PA Supreme Court's decision to keep the Green Party Presidential candidate, Howie Hawkins, off the ballot.  The Green Party was likely robbed of 30,000 to 75,000 votes -- meanwhile the voters who didn't prefer any of the candidates on the ballot - and wrote their choices in, weren't recognized in the official vote count.  

John Eastman Blisters Chapman Faculty in Resignation Letter

 

From the American Mind newsletter:

In recent days John Eastman has been the subject of many defamatory and scurrilous attacks regarding his actions as an advisor and attorney for President Donald Trump.

He sets the record straight in his resignation letter to Chapman University, Fowler School of Law.

Read more:

https://americanmind.org/salvo/john-eastmans-statement-on-his-retirement-from-chapman-university-fowler-school-of-law

DEBUNKED: The Dem's Reflex Reaction to Evidence of Voter Fraud

Just hours after the video of cases of ballots being pulled from under a table in State Farm Arena and then being counted without supervision -- and before anyone in an official capacity provided an explanation -- Georgia state Senator Elena Parent cried "that's been debunked." 

Another Senator calmly responded, "This video is only few hours old.   Who debunked it?

Parent exhibited the reflex reaction of most Democrats when she was confronted with the evidence of fraud.  When next confronted that the video hadn't been debunked, she moved to the next reflex reaction.

Parent stated that Trump had lost 40 of 41 court cases because the courts didn't accept the evidence of fraud.

At the time neither statement was true -- and both remain untrue today.   

PA's Pump and Dump for Biden...In Graphic Form

I previously reported on the Pump and Dump software algorithm that gave Joe Biden the victory in Pennsylvania

The following charts depict the algorithm's activity from 76 percent of the vote and forward until December 4, 2020 (based on Edison Research vote tallies as reported to the New York Times). 

At 76% of the vote, Trump had 54.7% of the vote while Biden had 43.9%.  The vote totals stood at Trump 2,976,329 to Biden's 2,388,681 -- a lead of 587,648 votes.

That all changed when the algorithm stole over 190,000 votes from Trump moved them to Biden.  

Note that the result of the algorithm is "double," meaning that the Biden gain is in addition to the Trump loss.   Therefore, the vote swing (by the algorithm) over this time period was 380,000 votes.

Algorithm Tweak Swung PA to Biden

The chart above depicts the Pennsylvania Presidential election count from 8PM EST on November 3rd to 11:30 AM EST on November 18th.

Summary

Overall, you see a hiccup (OOPS!) shortly after the start with Biden's numbers jumping up dramatically, then leveling, then declining at 16, then another spike at 18 and another decline at 19.  Trump's numbers also rocket up early, then climb with Biden's, then Trump's votes go on the same roller coaster with Biden. 

After the hiccup, Trump roars past Biden and built a substantial lead up until the vote count got to about 80%.   Trump built the lead despite an intervention that stole 17,000 votes and with a software algorithm routinely stealing .001% of his votes and moving them to Biden at routine intervals.

After the 80% mark, Trump went essentially flat while Biden caught  up and then passed him.  At that stage the algorithm was modified to move votes directly from Trump to Biden, while continuing the original "pump and dump" method of laundering votes through the Third Party to Biden. 

Trump Won Pennsylvania: Trump votes stolen & given to Biden.

Rudy Guiliani can quit arguing about Pennsylvania not counting some 600,000 unlawful votes cast in Pennsylvania and start arguing that nearly 290,000 voters need to have their votes restored.

It's a 14th Amendment, equal protection clause issue to be sure, as their right to vote for the candidate of their choice was DENIED. 

Sidney Powell Presser Statements About Algorithms & Fraud - Explained

At yesterday's press conference (transcript here), Trump Team lawyer Sidney Powell alleged that Smartmatic software was manipulating the election results and at some point in the night the algorithm broke down and the counting of votes had to be stopped to fix it.  See below (my emphasis added).

Now the software itself was created with so many variables and so many back doors that can be hooked up to the internet or a thumbdrive stuck in it or whatever, but one of its most characteristic features is its ability to flip votes. It can set and run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden which we might never have uncovered had the votes for President Trump not been so overwhelming in so many of these states that it broke the algorithm that had been plugged into the system and that’s what caused them to have to shut down in the states they shut down in. That’s when they came in the backdoor with all the mail-in ballots, many of which they had actually fabricated, some were on pristine paper with identically matching perfect circle dots for Mr. Biden. Others were shoved in in batches, they’re always put in in a certain number of batches and people would rerun the same batch. This corresponds to our statistical evidence that shows incredible spikes in the vote counts at particular times and that corresponds to eyewitness testimony of numerous people who have come forward and said they saw the ballots come in the backdoor at that time.

Powell, in an interview this morning with Fox Business News, explained that she's "not really a numbers person," so her explanation needs a little help.

No evidence of fraud...say those who haven't looked

 

Krebs:  Deservedly fired for unsupported remarks about security of 2020 election

Fired former head of the DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Chris Krebs, claimed in a statement:

"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

You can read the November 12, 2020 statement here.

What is missing from the statement is any evidence whatsoever to back up Krebs' claim or any real attempt to explain the data that shows votes that over 200,000 votes were switched from Trump to Biden in Pennsylvania.

While the statement dismisses the voter fraud claims as  "misinformation about the process of our elections," there has yet to be a state government official or local government official to address the discrepancies in the DATA.

Were 220K votes swapped in PA? It appears so!

President Trump's tweet claiming serious monkey business in the election return data was likely based on information from theDonald.win web-site, excerpted below:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Based on the following analysis, the switch of 220,833 mail-in votes is highly probable.