DEBUNKED: The Dem's Reflex Reaction to Evidence of Voter Fraud

Just hours after the video of cases of ballots being pulled from under a table in State Farm Arena and then being counted without supervision -- and before anyone in an official capacity provided an explanation -- Georgia state Senator Elena Parent cried "that's been debunked." 

Another Senator calmly responded, "This video is only few hours old.   Who debunked it?

Parent exhibited the reflex reaction of most Democrats when she was confronted with the evidence of fraud.  When next confronted that the video hadn't been debunked, she moved to the next reflex reaction.

Parent stated that Trump had lost 40 of 41 court cases because the courts didn't accept the evidence of fraud.

At the time neither statement was true -- and both remain untrue today.   

Media fact-checks purportedly "debunking" the State Farm Arena fiasco focus on ancillary information that doesn't debunk that illegal vote counting took place.  For example, this fact check states that poll watchers were not told to leave and that the ballots were not pulled from "suitcases" but from legal ballot containers.  

So what? Ballots were counted without watchers present.  That's illegal.

At the time of Parent's reaction, plaintiffs in election fraud cases had only prevailed in one case -- and that was the only case that allowed evidence to be heard.  The remaining 40 cases were dismissed on legal technicalities, such as standing and laches. 

I learned first hand just how reflexive Democrats are to evidence of voter fraud when I posted a graphic I had created -- just hours earlier -- to a Twitter conversation.

As you will see, the same false arguments (promoted by the mainstream media) are made immediately....it's been debunked.  Not only that, but the FBI and state police investigated the very chart I had just created.

It is truly sad that 40% of the country has been conditioned to react this way.  Note that I did not say "think his way" because there is no thought or cognitive function involved.  This is a conditioned response known as the "false condition effect" or "consensus bias" or "false consensus effect."

In this case, it is definitely "false consensus effect" based on a recent Gallup poll that found 60% of Americans have little to no trust in the media. 

The election fraud deniers, who trust the media, are clearly in the minority -- but they don't know that because the media pretends to represent the majority.

Ray Blehar, January 5, 2021, 11:37 AM EST