Top 10 Smoking Guns of 2020 Election System Compromises

 

Fact:  Votes were often deleted in the 2020 Presidential Election

About 40% of Americans (including 70% of registered Democrats) still believe the lie told by DHS/CISA's Christoper Krebs  that the 2020 U.S. election was the "most secure in American history."  The  majority believe the election was not on the up and up.   Over half of non-affiliated voters and 75% of Republican voters are among those in the latter group.

Kreb's November 12th statement also included this patently false statement:

"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

There is ample evidence to the contrary.

Here are my top ten 10 examples that 2020 election systems did not produce accurate results.  

To date, no one from the state governments or anyone else have provided  legitimate explanations to refute this proof of systemic error(s) in the election systems.   In some instances, state officials and/or their representatives confirmed the errors.

1.  Nearly 4 million votes subtracted from Biden and Trump over the course of the 2020 election.

2.   a.  No (zero) write-in votes in any race in the city of Detroit, Michigan.

      b.  No (zero) absentee write-in votes (out of 2.84 million) in Michigan

3.a.  Vote shifting in Antrim County, Michigan  

   b. Non-adjudication of write-in votes in Antrim County.

4.   9,000 more votes than possible on election night in Maricopa County, AZ.

5.   Double counting of ballots in Fulton County, Georgia.

6.   No write-in or minor party votes in the City of Milwaukee's 168,000 vote dump.

7.    Folded ballots cause miscounts in Windham, NH Congressional races.

8.    Approximately 70,000 missing votes for Green Party Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania.

9.    64,492 absentee votes removed from Trump in Pennsylvania.

10.   No (zero) absentee write-in votes in the battlegrounds Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin.

In the majority of cases, these problems were caused by system issues.  The only exceptions were the 4 million votes subtracted (#1) of which some was allegedly caused by human error and the duplicate ballot scanning in Georgia by unscrupulous election workers (#5).

Lyin' Josh Shapiro's PA "Audit" Lies

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro is petrified of what will be exposed when Senator Doug Mastriano conducts a forensic audit of the 2020 General Election.  Not only will it expose that Biden lost bigly, but that he (Shapiro) did too.

Out of fear, Lyin' Josh went on Twitter and spun up four falsehoods in a single tweet about the Pennsylvania 2020 election and Mastriano's audit.

First, let's address his "two audits" falsehood. 

There were not two "audits" in Pennsylvania if you understand the definition of an audit. 

Most audit definitions come from the world of finance and accounting.  The common thread among audit definitions is that audits "confirm the authenticity" of the records.  In this case, it's ballots and/or votes.

Nothing of the sort happened in Pennsylvania after the November 2020 election that confirmed the authenticity of the ballots.

What happened in Pennsylvania was nothing more than recounts based on a sample of ballots.  Whether those were legal ballots or illegal ballots remains in question.

That's why Democrats all over the US (and their media mouthpieces) are decrying post-election audits in the battleground states. 

Here are the details behind Lyin' Josh's "audits."

The first so-called "audit"was nothing more than a recount of a random sample of ballots.  However, that recount was FATALLY FLAWED because at least four counties had incomplete records of the number of voters (a total of 205,000 more votes were cast than voters).

Wanda Murren, a spokesperson for the Pennsylvania Secretary of State readily admitted the records were incomplete.

It is improper to draw a sample without first resolving the discrepancy between the number of voters and votes cast.  Was this issue duplicate ballots being counted?  Or was it a record keeping issue as alleged by Murren?  Or was it a combination of the two?

No one knows for sure. Only a forensic audit can resolve the questions.

Obviously, Pennsylvania should not have certified its election until the discrepancy was resolved.   To otherwise do so was illegal.

ARIZONA: 74K Excess Votes Still In Doubt

 

CNN's expert fact checker's source was "some friends of mine" 

It bears repeating -- whenever the media claims something is false or it's a conspiracy theory, then the opposite is probably true.

When Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan announced that the audit found 74K absentee ballots that were not mailed to voters (among other serious issues with Maricopa's election), the media's reflex reaction was to scramble and say it was debunked.

As it stands right now, those votes are still of questionable origin because neither Maricopa County nor a media data analyst have answered the question by using the authoritative data source.

Why PA Needs a Forensic Audit

 

PA's 2020 Election Results Don't Make Sense  (Analysis & graphics by Seth Keshel)

A picture is worth a thousand words and the "pictures" in this post get to the heart of why Pennsylvania's 2020 presidential election results should be forensically audited.   The results defy nearly every statistic that predicts election outcomes  -- especially voter registration trends.

Maricopa County Caught Red Handed

Maricopa County had a blank checkbook for casting absentee votes - and used it

 

Vote Dumps -- Caught Red-Handed

Arizona's 2020 election laws allowed all 15 counties to begin tabulating early votes two weeks prior to election day, thus the election night count started with two massive vote dumps of 625K and 1.47M right after the polls closed.   

Those dumps, totaling 2,098,619 votes came from Maricopa County because no other county had more than 527K votes (i.e., Pima at 526,319).   The official results canvass reveals that Maricopa cast only 2,089,563 votes  -- therefore the two dumps contained 9,000 more votes than possible -- for the entire election in Maricopa.   The source of the data table is Edison Research.

Worse yet, Biden’s total from the two dumps is 1.16 million - about 120K votes greater than reported for him in the FINAL results. 

When you consider that Election Day votes plus late arriving absentee votes had not yet been tabulated, the amount of fraudulent ballots in those dumps is a considerable number. 

How big?

The exact number of in-person votes cast in Maricopa County on Election Day is unknown (another audit problem), however, multiple sources reported 167K voters cast ballots at the polls.   If that is true, then the fraudulent ballot count for Maricopa County is at 296K votes (120K from first two dumps + 167K election day + original 9K early over) and counting.

The Navarro Report, Volume III estimated illegal votes at 254,772 across the state.  That total is obviously low.

Is it any wonder that the Arizona Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs, and the Democratic party operatives are in a frenzy over the ongoing audit --  and doing all they can do to stop it?

Millions of WIMP Votes Shifted Nationwide

Did shifted WIMP (Write-In & Minor Party) votes make Biden more "popular" than Clinton?

Back in 2016, then candidate Hillary Clinton got almost 3 million more popular votes than the Electoral College winner, Donald Trump.   

In 2020, Trump gained more popular votes as a sitting president than any of his predecessors.  Trump also received the highest percentage of non-white votes than any GOP candidate since Richard Nixon in 1960.  

Despite those statistics, Trump (allegedly) still lost to Biden by a little over 7 million votes.   

Or did he? 

Wisconsin's WIMP problem

Wisconsin's WIMP votes declined by 132K from 2016 to 2020

Wisconsin had a WIMP problem in the 2020 election. 

WIMP is an acronym for Write-In and Minor Party.   The graphic above shows that WIMP votes declined by 132,307 votes from 2016 to 2020.     Similar declines have been found in other key battleground states -- for example:

Arizona:                Minor Party:  -106,100;  Write-In:  -51,238  

Georgia:               Minor Party:    -83,192:  Write-In:  -20,155

Pennsylvania:       Minor Party:  -180,752:  Write-In: -113,417

Are all of these declines a coincidence?  Did  minor party and other voters decide to acquiesce and vote for a major party candidate?  Or do these declines represent this a systemic issue in our US elections/voting systems?

Evidence suggests the latter.

In each of the states listed above, the decline in Write-In votes was greater than Biden's margins of victory.